Article "NM i vektløfting 1956" in Norwegian Wikipedia has 8.5 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 9 sections.
Since the creation of article "NM i vektløfting 1956", its content was written by 1 registered users of Norwegian Wikipedia and edited by 1 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 85 times in Norwegian Wikipedia and cited 85 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #206037 05.2021 |
Global: #10797539 05.2021 |
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #29568 05.2021 |
Global: #2469035 05.2021 |
On 4 June 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Kylian Mbappé, Claudia Sheinbaum, ChatGPT, 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, Jannik Sinner, YouTube, UEFA Euro 2024, June 4, Carlos Alcaraz, Real Madrid CF.
In Norwegian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Dag Erik Pedersen, Oddmund Løkensgard Hoel, Atle Pedersen, Odd Pedersen, Dag Otto Lauritzen, EM i fotball 2024, Boris Johnson, Mesternes Mester, Rod Stewart, Heggspinnmøll.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(6.69+0+0+36+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
